Search Site
Menu
Textbook Mistake: Message to Wrong Number Lands Dealer in Jail

A particularly inept aspiring New Jersey drug dealer recently texted himself all the way to jail by messaging a detective he mistakenly believed was a potential customer. After agreeing to meet at a local pizza parlor, ostensibly for the sale of a quarter-pound of marijuana, the dealer quickly fled when he suspected that his new customer might be planning to arrest him. After police stopped the suspect’s vehicle and performed a search with a warrant based on a police dog’s detection of narcotics, the dealer was arrested for possession of drugs.

Can my vehicle be searched for drugs when police pull me over?

Under the U.S. Constitution, every individual is entitled to a reasonable expectation of privacy, subject to certain limitations, and every search must therefore be considered reasonable. Generally, this means police must have a warrant that permits them to search the property. Because of their presence in public on the open road, the law deems drivers to have a diminished expectation of privacy and, therefore, the police may search a car without a warrant, provided there is probable cause that a search would reveal that the vehicle contains illegal substances. Probable cause can be established by seeing contraband in plain view or smelling contraband coming from the vehicle. In New Jersey, there must also be an element of exigency that makes waiting to obtain a warrant impractical or impossible at that time.

Can my vehicle be searched without probable cause?

A police officer without a warrant and without probable cause may still legally be able to search a vehicle simply by seeking and receiving the driver’s consent. Surprisingly, many drivers with contraband in their vehicles agree to such searches. All consent, however, must be free from coercion, duress or threats and must be completely voluntary.

Can I fight charges based on a warrantless search?

In many cases, the evidence law enforcement gathers at the time of the arrest is not admissible in court because the search through which it was obtained violated the law. Qualified counsel can attack such evidence on a number of grounds. Not least of all, the nature of the consent can be attacked based on the involuntariness of the consent. Factors that may help establish that consent was involuntary include:

  • The individual was already in custody when consent was given or the individual wasn’t advised of the right to refuse consent.
  • Law enforcement misrepresented probable cause to search.
  • Law enforcement employed overly coercive tactics or intimidation to elicit consent.

Those facing drug charges can put the experienced criminal defense lawyers of Hoffman DiMuzio on their side to develop effective defenses against accusers.

Speak to a proven New Jersey attorney now
Call 856.238.5183 or click to schedule your free consultation
  • By Renee Zagarella

    "Wonderful, knowledgeable, kind, and informative! Within days following my free consultation, I was provided with an overview of my appointment with helpful information about my case. I truly appreciate the recommendation I was given at this firm."

    SEE ALL REVIEWS
  • By Anita Campana

    "I was so very impressed with Hoffman DiMuzio from the moment I walked in. Everyone I had come across was so professional and courteous."

    SEE ALL REVIEWS
  • By Anita Campana

    "I mostly saw Peter who got the best possible results for my case. He was extremely knowledgeable and informative. Jodi was always available to answer my questions if Peter was busy and kept me informed. I would recommend this firm to anyone!"

    SEE ALL REVIEWS
  • By Mike W

    "Hoffman DiMuzio is a top notch firm. Their attorneys and staff are extremely knowledgeable and go above and beyond for you. I recommend them to everyone in need of legal service."

    SEE ALL REVIEWS
  • By Harry McCormick

    When my significant other was falsely accused of committing a crime, there was only one place to turn. that place was hoffman dimuzio.

    SEE ALL REVIEWS
  • By Harry McCormick

    "Joe Hoffman Jr took on our case and fought tooth and nail for us. Exposing the truth and serving justice for us, we felt completely vindicated. For any legal matter, criminal, traffic or otherwise, they gained two very satisfied life long customers! Thank you Mr Hoffman!"

    SEE ALL REVIEWS
Joseph J.  Hoffman, Jr. Attorney Photo
Joseph J. Hoffman, Jr.
Senior Partner

For more than 40 years, Mr. Hoffman has protected the interest of his clients through diligence and hard work on legal matters, both large and small. An honors graduate of Rutgers University Law School and a native of Gloucester County, Mr. Hoffman has won numerous accolades for excellence in the practice of law.

Kenneth A. DiMuzio, Sr. Attorney Photo
Kenneth A. DiMuzio, Sr.
Senior Partner

An attorney with over 45 years of professional experience, Mr. DiMuzio concentrates his practice on personal injury and workers’ compensation matters. A graduate of Georgetown University Law School and a native of Gloucester County, Mr. DiMuzio has been honored time and again for his professionalism and ethics in the practice of law.

Ernest L.  Alvino, Jr. Attorney Photo
Ernest L. Alvino, Jr.
Attorney

About Ernest L. Alvino, Jr. concentrates his practice in the area of workplace injuries; construction accidents; product injuries; trucking accidents; auto injuries; medical negligence and crime victim advocacy. Ernie is a lifelong Gloucester County resident, living in Mullica Hill with his wife and children. Ernie worked his way through school as a Teamster and construction…

Jeremiah J. Atkins Attorney Photo
Jeremiah J. Atkins
Attorney

About Mr. Atkins joined the firm of Hoffman DiMuzio in February 2010. Mr. Atkins represents individuals and corporate clients in commercial and employment litigation. Mr. Atkins’ practice covers a wide variety of employment-related matters before New Jersey State and Federal courts, with a focus on discrimination, retaliation, sexual harassment, family leave and whistleblowing claims. Mr.…

Peter J. Bonfiglio, III Attorney Photo
Peter J. Bonfiglio, III
Attorney

About Mr. Bonfiglio concentrates his practice in the area of municipal court with an emphasis on defense of individuals charged with driving while intoxicated and/or refusal to submit to a breath test. Pete resides in Gloucester Township, Camden County with his wife and two of his three children.  In addition to his law practice, he…

  • Imagine... One law firm, for life.


    New Jersey attorneys for all legal matters

    For all life's stages. For all South Jersey.

Six convenient locations


We'll meet at the office nearest you

  • Franklinville
  • Turnersville
  • Mullica Hill
  • Woodbury
  • Sewell
  • Philadelphia
Take action now by filling out the form below

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship, but a lawyer from our firm will contact you as soon as possible.

Quick Contact Form